Independent Geomatics Analysis
Standards unpacked. Risks identified. Decisions supported. Independent analysis for geomatics professionals.
Analysis across four critical dimensions of geomatics
How experienced clients structure survey governance, manage risk, and avoid costly assumptions before mobilisation.
What IMCA, IOGP and ISO standards actually require – and where they deliberately leave gaps for operator judgment.
Recurring survey mistakes, dangerous assumptions, and anti-patterns that damage project outcomes.
Strategic perspectives for senior managers: when to seek independent review, how to de-risk projects, what advisors look for.
Recent articles on geomatics risks, standards, and decision-making
Geoportal alternatives to Esri and ArcGIS, by archetype – open-source, commercial and cloud – and why the lock-in that bites is your data, not the licence.
Surveying free spans on subsea pipelines: almost any method gives the span length, but the gap beneath the pipe – the number VIV fatigue turns on – is the hard part.
Cellula and DRDC's 385-hour Envoy AUV run signals a shift. We analyse what changes in survey planning when your platform stays submerged for weeks.
Why Arctic GNSS Positioning Fails Above 70°N – And What Actually Works
21 views
Battery Packs in Pressure Housings: Field Lessons from Three Decades
7 views
Long-Endurance AUVs: Rethinking Survey Planning for Multi-Week Dives
6 views
GNSS Jamming Offshore: What It Means for PNT When GPS Fails
6 views
Conflict-Zone GNSS Interference: Offshore Positioning Resilience for 2026
5 views